🔗 Share this article

These days exhibit a very unusual situation: the pioneering US parade of the overseers. They vary in their qualifications and traits, but they all have the common goal – to stop an Israeli breach, or even destruction, of Gaza’s unstable ceasefire. After the conflict ended, there have been few occasions without at least one of Donald Trump’s delegates on the ground. Only in the last few days featured the likes of Jared Kushner, a businessman, JD Vance and a political figure – all appearing to carry out their assignments.

The Israeli government occupies their time. In just a few short period it initiated a set of operations in Gaza after the killings of two Israel Defense Forces (IDF) troops – leading, as reported, in many of Palestinian injuries. A number of officials called for a resumption of the conflict, and the Israeli parliament enacted a preliminary measure to annex the West Bank. The US stance was somehow ranging from “no” and “hell no.”

But in more than one sense, the US leadership seems more focused on preserving the current, uneasy phase of the truce than on moving to the next: the reconstruction of the Gaza Strip. When it comes to this, it seems the US may have goals but few specific proposals.

Currently, it remains unclear at what point the proposed global governing body will truly begin operating, and the same applies to the designated peacekeeping troops – or even the identity of its soldiers. On a recent day, Vance declared the US would not force the structure of the foreign contingent on Israel. But if the prime minister's government keeps to dismiss various proposals – as it acted with the Ankara's suggestion this week – what follows? There is also the opposite question: which party will decide whether the troops favoured by Israel are even willing in the mission?

The question of the duration it will take to disarm the militant group is equally ambiguous. “Our hope in the administration is that the international security force is will now take the lead in demilitarizing the organization,” stated Vance recently. “It’s may need some time.” Trump only reinforced the lack of clarity, saying in an interview on Sunday that there is no “rigid” timeline for the group to disarm. So, theoretically, the unknown elements of this still unformed international contingent could deploy to the territory while Hamas militants continue to hold power. Are they confronting a leadership or a militant faction? These represent only some of the concerns surfacing. Some might wonder what the verdict will be for everyday Palestinians as things stand, with the group carrying on to attack its own adversaries and dissidents.

Recent events have yet again emphasized the blind spots of Israeli journalism on both sides of the Gaza frontier. Each source strives to analyze every possible aspect of the group's infractions of the ceasefire. And, usually, the fact that Hamas has been delaying the return of the remains of deceased Israeli hostages has dominated the news.

By contrast, attention of civilian casualties in the region stemming from Israeli operations has garnered scant focus – if any. Consider the Israeli counter strikes after a recent southern Gaza incident, in which two soldiers were lost. While local sources claimed dozens of casualties, Israeli television commentators criticised the “moderate answer,” which targeted only infrastructure.

This is typical. Over the past weekend, the information bureau alleged Israel of violating the peace with the group multiple occasions since the agreement was implemented, causing the death of 38 individuals and harming another 143. The assertion seemed insignificant to most Israeli news programmes – it was merely ignored. Even accounts that eleven members of a local family were lost their lives by Israeli troops recently.

The civil defence agency stated the individuals had been attempting to return to their residence in the Zeitoun neighbourhood of Gaza City when the transport they were in was attacked for reportedly passing the “demarcation line” that demarcates areas under Israeli military control. This limit is not visible to the naked eye and shows up solely on maps and in official records – not always available to everyday people in the area.

Even that incident hardly got a mention in Israeli news outlets. Channel 13 News covered it in passing on its digital site, quoting an Israeli military representative who said that after a suspicious vehicle was identified, troops fired alerting fire towards it, “but the vehicle kept to advance on the forces in a way that caused an immediate danger to them. The forces shot to neutralize the danger, in accordance with the ceasefire.” Zero injuries were reported.

Given this narrative, it is little wonder many Israeli citizens believe the group solely is to blame for breaking the truce. That belief could lead to encouraging calls for a tougher approach in Gaza.

Eventually – perhaps sooner rather than later – it will no longer be enough for US envoys to take on the role of caretakers, advising the Israeli government what to refrain from. They will {have to|need